Reporting a Crime.
If the crime is ongoing call 999, you should not put yours or anyone else’s safety at risk by taking action yourself...link
Drink-driving is a serious criminal offence. You can be prosecuted for driving or attempting to drive while over the prescribed alcohol limit, driving while unfit through drink or being in charge of a vehicle while over the limit.
You do not have to be involved in an accident or be driving badly to commit an offence. A driver can be prosecuted solely because the amount of alcohol in their breath, blood or urine exceeds the legal limit.
The current legal limits in England and Wales are:
The same limits currently apply in Northern Ireland. However, separate reforms have been proposed there.
Scotland has had a lower drink-drive limit since December 2014. The Scottish limits are:
A driver travelling between England and Scotland must comply with the limit applying where they are driving. Someone who is below the limit in England could still be over the limit after crossing into Scotland.
The government announced in January 2026 that it would consult on reducing the drink-drive limit in England and Wales. One option is to bring it into line with Scotland's limit of 50 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.
A consultation or government proposal does not itself change the law. Unless and until legislation is brought into force, the current 80 milligram blood limit and corresponding breath and urine limits continue to apply in England and Wales.
There is no reliable rule based on a particular number of drinks. Statements such as "one pint is safe" or "two glasses of wine are allowed" can be dangerously misleading.
The amount of alcohol recorded in a person's body can be affected by:
Alcohol can also impair judgement, reaction time and coordination before the legal limit is reached. The safest approach is not to drink alcohol before driving.
Sleeping, drinking coffee, eating breakfast or taking a shower will not remove alcohol from the body immediately. Alcohol is processed gradually, and a person may remain over the limit the following morning.
Drivers should be particularly careful after a late night or heavy drinking session. Feeling sober does not prove that the alcohol level has fallen below the legal limit.
A police officer may require a preliminary breath test in several circumstances, including where the officer reasonably suspects that:
The police do not necessarily need to observe poor driving before requiring a test. A minor moving traffic offence, an accident, or information that gives rise to a reasonable suspicion may be sufficient.
The roadside breath test is a preliminary screening test. It is commonly administered using a handheld device.
If the result indicates that the driver may be over the limit, or if the driver refuses or fails to cooperate without a reasonable excuse, the police may arrest them and take them to a police station for an evidential test.
A roadside reading is not normally the evidence ultimately used to prove the amount of alcohol for an excess-alcohol charge. The formal evidential procedure usually takes place at the police station.
At the police station, the driver will normally be required to provide two specimens of breath using an approved evidential breath-testing machine.
The lower of the two valid readings will ordinarily be used. If that reading is above the prescribed limit, the driver may be charged or released. At the same time, the case is considered.
The police should follow the statutory procedure and explain the requirement to provide the specimens. The driver should be warned that failure to provide them without a reasonable excuse is an offence.
A driver no longer has a general right in England and Wales to replace a relatively low positive evidential breath reading with a blood or urine test. This former right was known as the statutory option and was removed from the law.
The police may nevertheless require blood or urine in circumstances permitted by law, including where:
The police generally decide whether the alternative specimen will be blood or urine, subject to the statutory procedure and any medical considerations.
Special safeguards apply where a person is receiving treatment at a hospital. The police cannot simply interfere with urgent medical care to obtain a sample.
A blood specimen normally requires the involvement of an appropriate healthcare professional. Depending on the circumstances, the person's consent or permission may be required before the specimen can be taken or analysed.
Failing to provide a roadside test or an evidential specimen without a reasonable excuse can amount to a separate criminal offence.
Refusing because you believe the test is unnecessary, because you would prefer a different type of specimen or because you are concerned that the result will not be normal will not normally be a reasonable excuse.
A reasonable excuse may sometimes arise from a genuine physical or mental condition that made it impossible or unreasonable to provide the specimen. Medical evidence will often be important.
Examples might include a respiratory condition affecting the ability to provide breath or a severe medically recognised phobia affecting the provision of blood. Each case depends on its evidence.
Failure to cooperate with a preliminary roadside test is distinct from failing to provide an evidential specimen at a police station or hospital.
The potential penalties and driving consequences can differ depending on which requirement was refused and whether the person was driving, attempting to drive or merely in charge of the vehicle.
A person may commit an offence even if no reliable alcohol reading is available or the reading is below the prescribed limit.
Driving while unfit through drink concerns whether alcohol has impaired the person's ability to drive properly. Evidence may include:
A driver can therefore be prosecuted for being unfit even where the prosecution does not rely on an above-limit breath, blood or urine result.
A person does not have to be driving to be prosecuted. It is an offence to be in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place while over the prescribed limit or unfit through drink.
Whether someone was "in charge" depends on the facts. Relevant matters may include:
A person sleeping in a parked vehicle after drinking could still be investigated. Leaving the keys elsewhere, arranging alternative transport, and having no intention of driving may be relevant, but no single precaution guarantees that no offence has been committed.
A person accused of being in charge while over the limit may have a defence if they can prove that there was no likelihood of them driving while the proportion of alcohol remained above the prescribed limit.
This can require detailed evidence about their intentions, where the vehicle was located, access to the keys and how long it would have taken for their alcohol level to fall.
The police may investigate someone after the journey has ended, particularly following an accident or report of suspected drink-driving.
A later specimen can be used as evidence. In general, the law allows the court to presume that the alcohol level at the time of driving was at least as high as the level shown in the later specimen, subject to evidence capable of challenging that presumption.
A driver may claim that alcohol was consumed only after driving but before the police obtained the specimen. This is sometimes called a post-driving consumption or "hip-flask" issue.
Such a claim does not automatically defeat the prosecution. Expert evidence may be used to calculate what the alcohol level would probably have been without the later drinking.
The court will also consider the credibility of the account, the amount allegedly consumed, the timing and whether there is supporting evidence.
Possible issues in a drink-driving case can include:
A procedural irregularity does not automatically result in the case being dismissed. The court will consider the legal significance of the error and whether the prosecution can still prove the offence.
Obtain legal advice before deciding to plead guilty or not guilty. Drink-driving law is technical, and an unsuccessful trial can increase the legal costs and reduce the credit available for a guilty plea.
A person convicted of driving or attempting to drive while over the prescribed limit or unfit through drink may receive:
The minimum ban is normally at least three years where the offender has a relevant previous conviction within the preceding ten years.
Being in charge of a vehicle while over the limit or unfit through drink can result in:
The exact sentence will depend on the alcohol level, the circumstances and the likelihood of the vehicle being driven.
Failing without reasonable excuse to provide an evidential specimen in circumstances involving driving or attempting to drive can result in:
The court may treat a deliberate refusal intended to conceal a very high alcohol level particularly seriously.
Causing death by careless driving while over the alcohol limit, unfit through drink or having failed to provide a specimen is an extremely serious offence.
The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. A conviction can also result in an unlimited fine, a lengthy mandatory disqualification and an extended driving test before the licence can be restored.
Magistrates use sentencing guidelines that take account of the alcohol reading and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Aggravating factors can include:
Mitigating factors may include:
The loss of employment caused by a driving ban will not normally prevent disqualification. A mandatory ban cannot generally be avoided merely because the offender needs to drive for work.
Where disqualification is mandatory, the court must impose a ban unless it finds special reasons relating to the offence.
Special reasons are not the same as personal hardship. They must relate to the circumstances of the offence rather than simply the consequences of disqualification.
Examples sometimes argued include:
These arguments are difficult and require credible evidence. Even where a special reason is established, the court retains discretion over whether to reduce or avoid disqualification.
A court may offer an approved drink-drive rehabilitation course to someone convicted of an eligible drink-driving offence and disqualified for at least 12 months.
The offender must agree to take the course and pay the fee. If it is completed within the required period, the driving ban is usually reduced by one quarter.
The course does not remove the conviction, fine or endorsement. It reduces only the period of disqualification.
Some disqualified drink-drivers are classified as high-risk offenders. This includes certain people who:
The current high-risk alcohol thresholds include:
A high-risk offender does not automatically regain their licence when the ban ends. They must apply for a new licence and satisfy the DVLA that they are medically fit to drive.
This may involve a medical examination, blood tests and enquiries about alcohol consumption. A high-risk offender cannot normally drive while waiting for the DVLA to complete this process and issue a new licence.
The effect of a drink-driving conviction can continue after the fine and disqualification have ended. Consequences may include:
Professional drivers, healthcare workers, teachers, lawyers and others working in regulated occupations may need to report the conviction to their employer or regulatory body.
Remain calm and cooperate with lawful testing requirements. Refusing a specimen is not a reliable way of avoiding prosecution and can create an additional serious offence.
At the police station, you are entitled to request independent legal advice. Legal advice at the police station is normally available without charge, regardless of income.
Tell your solicitor about:
Do not assume that being only slightly over the limit makes the allegation unimportant. A conviction for driving over the limit normally results in a mandatory disqualification.
Public attitudes towards drink-driving have changed considerably. Still, it continues to cause deaths and serious injuries. Enforcement campaigns often increase around Christmas, major sporting events and the summer holiday period, although the police can conduct checks throughout the year.
The law sets a maximum permitted alcohol level; it does not provide a guaranteed safe amount to drink. The simplest rule remains the most reliable: if you intend to drive, avoid alcohol.
Seek advice from a motoring law solicitor promptly if you have failed a breath test, been released under investigation, been charged with an offence or received a court summons.
A solicitor can examine the testing procedure and evidence, advise on the likely sentence, identify any defence or special-reasons argument and represent you in court.
Disclaimer: Solicitors.com is not a firm of solicitors. Content on this site is provided for general information about the law of England and Wales and is not legal advice. Different alcohol limits and procedures apply in Scotland and may apply in Northern Ireland. You should obtain advice from a regulated solicitor about your circumstances. Although we aim to keep information accurate and up to date, motoring law can change. Use of this site does not establish a solicitor-client relationship.
Feedback: Is anything on this page incorrect or incomplete? Suggested amendments may be credited. Please email us.
What is Double Jeopardy? and is it still Law in the UK?..
linkIf the crime is ongoing call 999, you should not put yours or anyone else’s safety at risk by taking action yourself...link
Children and the Law Consensual Sex
To consent is to agree to something, so when you are talking about the age of consent it is the age at which that law state..link
How to apply for one, and what is an injunction? - If you are seeking an injunction we would recommend that you take immediate advice...link
Over 2000 section 60 notices have been issued in London last year..
linkFinders Keepers | Finders Law
Ever since the phrase came into being in the early nineteenth century, documented as no halfers-findee, lossee seekee, which sou..link
Dogs and the Law.
Does your dog need a license, should it be chipped are you buying it from a reputable breeder and is it covered under the Dangerous Dogs Act?..link
Plea services launched on-line for motoring offences -
The Government has launched a new service that allows motorists charged with summary offences to enter a..link
Police Chiefs are calling for a change in the 'stop and search' l..
linkThe Law Commission has called for a full review of the law dealing with digital crime...link
Police cautions and warnings are the same and can be issued to anyone over the age of ten for minor offences, whilst this does not count as a conviction it can..link
New guidelines have been issued to crack down on online hate...link
Solicitors.com are not a firm of solicitors, and any content on the site should not be used in substitute for obtaining Legal advice from a solicitor regulated in the UK, Solicitors.com recommends that you contact a firm of solicitors to discuss your individual legal requirement. Whilst we strive to bring you accurate up to date content, all content on this site is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct. Use of this site does not create a client relationship.